+ Add listing

Battery Point Medical - Dr Scott Macrossan

(1 Reviews)
53 Sandy Bay Rd, Battery Point TAS 7004, Australia

Report Incorrect Data Write a Review

Contacts

DETAILS: Doctor, Health, (Edit)
Address: 53 Sandy Bay Rd, Battery Point TAS 7004, Australia
Postal code: 7004
Phone: (03) 6105 0700
Website: https://www.batterypointmedical.com.au/
Opening hours (Edit)
Monday:7:30 AM – 4:30 PM
Tuesday:7:30 AM – 4:30 PM
Wednesday:7:30 AM – 4:30 PM
Thursday:7:30 AM – 4:30 PM
Friday:7:30 AM – 4:30 PM
Saturday:10:00 AM – 1:00 PM
Sunday:Closed

Customer Ratings and Reviews

  • Lucy Seddon on Google

    (December 10, 2018, 3:21 am)

    This practice is amazing! Onsite parking, beautiful waiting rooms, friendly and caring staff and doctors who genuinely care!

Write a Review

Photos of Battery Point Medical - Dr Scott Macrossan

Questions & Answers

What is the phone number for Battery Point Medical - Dr Scott Macrossan?

The phone number for Battery Point Medical - Dr Scott Macrossan is (03) 6105 0700.


Where is Battery Point Medical - Dr Scott Macrossan located?

Battery Point Medical - Dr Scott Macrossan is located at 53 Sandy Bay Rd, Battery Point TAS 7004, Australia


What is the internet address for Battery Point Medical - Dr Scott Macrossan?

The website (URL) for Battery Point Medical - Dr Scott Macrossan is: https://www.batterypointmedical.com.au/


What days are Battery Point Medical - Dr Scott Macrossan open?

Battery Point Medical - Dr Scott Macrossan is open:
Monday:7:30 AM – 4:30 PM
Tuesday:7:30 AM – 4:30 PM
Wednesday:7:30 AM – 4:30 PM
Thursday:7:30 AM – 4:30 PM
Friday:7:30 AM – 4:30 PM
Saturday:10:00 AM – 1:00 PM
Sunday:Closed

Submit a review for Battery Point Medical - Dr Scott Macrossan

Your rating *
(100 Character minimum)

Tips for writing a great review:
  1. Be specific about your experience and the services that were provided.
  2. Be truthful - this review will help other consumers as well as the business.
  3. Be polite - give feedback in a constructive way.

Related Searches

x
What's wrong with this review?
What's wrong with this content?